Articles Comments

SENTRY JOURNAL » Bill Nye, Climate Change, MSNBC, Rachel Maddow » Bill Nye the "Climatologist Guy?"

Bill Nye the "Climatologist Guy?"

Yes that’s right; the left’s new patriotic expert on climate change is the one and only Bill Nye the Science Guy!  MSNBC’s hard left Rachel Maddow interviewed the one time Boeing Engineer, children’s television star, and comedian turned scientist on the claims made by those wacky global warming skeptics about heavy snowfall and the relationship it has with global warming.  It was really quite a pitiful thing to watch. This so called expert with a 4 year mechanical engineering degree called the skeptics who questioned the heavy snowfall in Washington unpatriotic for questioning the science.

Maddow guided this clown through her leftist maze of questioning.  He hit all the hard left talking points and then ridiculed older people for having a hard time grasping the idea of mass population and how it impacts the climate.  Oh by the way he stated that younger people have a better understanding of climate change.  I’m sure they do after going through the government’s reeducation…I mean public school systems.  He compared the difference between weather and climate by stating weather is a small scale phenomenon that happens day to day while the other is a big phenomenon.  He then proceeded to get lost in his words a bit as he made a weak case for areas of the world that experience different types of climates.

It also appears he got most of his information from one internet source.  Ok NOAA to be exact.  Wait a minute, wasn’t there a story about NOAA setting up a new agency to study and report climate change?  Maybe I’m thinking of something else.  Anyway the cherry on the sundae was when he praised the embattled IPCC for winning the Nobel Prize for discovering climate change through all kinds of evidence.  You all remember all that sound scientific evidence.  I think he’s talking about the same evidence that was manipulated by scientists because it just didn’t fit into their global warming scheme.  Oh yea I almost forgot, later they discovered that a large amount of climate data was missing or deleted.  And we can’t leave out how the IPCC used the information in a student’s dissertation paper from an article in a mountaineering magazine to make claims that the Himalayan glaciers would be melted by 2035.  I guess we’re just crazy “climaters” for going against the science.  Heck why not just lump us in with the “911 truthers” or “birthers,” I mean this is just all crazy talk challenging climate change science.

Take a look at the video clip below and judge for yourself if he made the case.

In my opinion if he was a doctor trying to make the case that I needed some type of procedure done, I would get a second opinion.  His skills as an orator are weak and he doesn’t really make a strong case if you ask me.  I mean it is borderline pathetic.  But this is how the left works when their world is crumbling down around them; attack, attack, attack.  They parade out unqualified people to make outrageous claims and attack the disbelievers.

I mean if they’re reaching in the cupboard to pull out Bill Nye the “Climatologist Guy,” to make their case, then the cupboard must be pretty darn bare.

That’s my two cents for what it’s worth.


Digg!

Share
Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Filed under: Bill Nye, Climate Change, MSNBC, Rachel Maddow

opinions powered by SendLove.to
Comments
  • Right Hand Man February 12, 2010 at 10:41 AM

    I hear Countdown is going to have Bozo the Clown on tomorrow to explain the health care bill to us…which is a step up from the host.

    What is most hilarious thing about this video is her smug look. Every time he makes a statement in step with the leftist agenda she gives a look of pride as if getting Bill Nye to agree with you is some kind of trump on the argument. Judging from the past, Nye is probably the most qualified person the left has on the subject – he does have 120 credits in some science.

  • Ron Russell February 12, 2010 at 8:30 PM

    Its snowing so global warming is to blame, so when its temperature goes about 100 then shouldn't global cooling be the blame—hard to have it both ways and be believed. These global warming fanatics are having a difficult time getting the pieces of this huge puzzle to fit together–kind of sad to watch them fumble with the many pieces!

  • John Carey February 13, 2010 at 12:21 AM

    Right, what do you mean by going to have Bozo? I believe they already do. Maddow is so blinded by her leftist ideology she doesn't even realize how ignorant she really is.

  • John Carey February 13, 2010 at 12:27 AM

    Thanks for the comment Ron.

    But you see Ron they want it both ways. If it snows 10 feet in 2 days, well that because of global warming. However if it is 100 degrees in the summer, well that's global warming also. You see what they can't seem to grasp is the climate is continuously changing. We have had periods of cooling, periods of drought, and yes periods of warming. Scientists know this because it has been happening over and over again for 1,000s of years. Climate change is more about the elitist controlling every aspect of our lives than actual climate change.

  • LD Jackson February 13, 2010 at 1:54 PM

    One thing about it, these folks have a one track mind. No matter what happens, they are going to either blame it on global warming or George W. Bush. The mainstream media has let them off the hook on this for so long, has let them have a free pass from having to explain themselves, they have gotten used to it. Until something happens to shock them into reality, they will continue.

  • Right Hand Man February 14, 2010 at 9:26 AM

    Have you seen this?

    http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/warmlist.htm

    Thought you might think it was funny – and interesting. It's a list of links to things attributed to global warming.

  • John Carey February 14, 2010 at 10:49 PM

    I have seen it Right.
    Very pathetic. They have set the table so that no matter what happens with the climate it's global warming. Win win for the global warming alarmist.