SENTRY JOURNAL » Uncategorized » Is it Time to Start Suing the Occupods?
Is it Time to Start Suing the Occupods?
Imagine that you’re trying to get to work, and you’re an hourly worker. But, the Occupods have blocked the streets, and you can’t get there on time, or not at all. The Occupod organizers have planned the protest, and their drones followed their orders. Can you, then, sue the organizer for depriving you you of opportunity to work?
Imagine that you own a small business, like a shop or a restaurant, and the Occupods have blocked the street. You lose customers, and therefore income. Maybe they are targeting you. Maybe they are just occupying space. Can you sue the organizers for actively and intentionally preventing people from getting to your business?
Some of the biggest victims of the Occupods have been small businesses, and their workers. When the Occupods bring their special brand of illness, drugs, human waste, crime, and failure to a town, it’s often the little guys that suffer. We already know that people have lost their jobs over OWS, and some small businesses are on the brink of failing because customers don’t want to be assailed, groped, or robbed by the Occupods.
So, here is my question: People are valuable, as well as is their time. If they are prevented from earning a living due to the Occupods, can the Occupod Commissars be sued for their actions? After all, these protests are centrally organized, and they are causing financial damage to others. Why then, cannot workers and businesses seek compensation for these losses?
Of course, the Occupods will claim free speech. However, free speech does not include blocking public streets, occupying public spaces, and not allowing others to pass. It does not count for blocking businesses, not matter how large or small. Of course, the Occupods are Marxists, so they really don’t care if some people are hurt. Since they don’t value the individual, a few can be damaged, so as long as they get their murderous utopia.
Oh, and by the way, OWS has a few hundred grand in the bank, so it isn’t like they can’t pay out to the people that they have hurt.
Filed under: Uncategorized · Tags: Damages, Lawsuit, Losses, Occupy Wall Street, OWS


























That is a good question Matt and I don’t know the answer but I do know that manyh people are losing business and work hours because of these people and something should be done about it. What I can’t figure out is why the mayors of these cities aren’t facing more of a backlash from the communities which are being negatively impacted by these people. Why are they siding with the protesters instead of the people that help make these cities run. It doesn’t make any sense and I think it will hurt them in the long run.
Steve Dennis recently posted..The Super Committee fails, is anyone really surprised?
Good Question, Matt. Your right in saying that free speech does not equal hurting businesses and workers, and infringing on others right to earn a living. I think that suing the occupods is a good option. Personally, I’m not sure why the occupods aren’t required to obtain permits for protests or relegated to certain areas. And, if they loiter in other areas beyond those relegated or locations which are on their permits the occupods should be arrested.
Teresa recently posted..Mysterious and Beautiful: Natalie Wood — Rule 5
A tantalizing idea! However, the legal panorama is more full of possibilities by scrutinizing the laws and city regulations that are being broken by these occupations and whose enforcement lies squarely with the city, county, or state. There is where the legal action could have more positive results.
John Galt recently posted..Fleming On Fleming: Obama, The Greatest President in the History of Everything.
[...] Best Thanksgiving Photoshop of the Day: VP Biden Pardons… What? Pundette: Newtworld SJ: Is it Time to Start Suing the Occupods? Spellchek: Obama blocks Keystone pipeline – did climate change or big labor win? RR: Dennis [...]