Articles Comments

SENTRY JOURNAL » Uncategorized » Patrick Henry: Give me liberty, or give me death!

Patrick Henry: Give me liberty, or give me death!

Two years ago today President Obama signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.  For the first time in our nation’s history people are now slaves to a government program that mandates they purchase an insurance plan or face a penalty.  The act of an all controlling leviathan.  Liberty was lost on that day.  Call it planned or a strange coincident but the President signed this liberty stealing act on the anniversary of Patrick Henry’s famous “give me liberty or give me death” speech during the Virginia Convention at the ,St John’s Church in Richmond Virginia.  Henry’s words moved and inspired a people into action.  Below is the entire speech he gave in response to increasingly oppressive British rule over the American colonies.  Please take a few moments to read his powerful words.

No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope that it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen, if, entertaining as I do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve.

This is no time for ceremony. The question before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty towards the majesty of heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.

Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren, till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation?

For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth — to know the worst and to provide for it. I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided; and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years, to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the House?

Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with these warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation — the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motives for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies?

No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us; they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging. And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer on the subject? Nothing.

We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves longer.

Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament.

Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne. In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer any room for hope.

If we wish to be free — if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending — if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained, we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of Hosts is all that is left us!

They tell us, sir, that we are weak — unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance, by lying supinely on our backs, and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot?

Sir, we are not weak, if we make a proper use of the means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. Three millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us.

The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable — and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come!

It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, “Peace! Peace!” — but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!

It doesn’t get any better than that folks.  We are a nation because men such as Patrick Henry lived.  Once again, thank you Mr, Henry for reminding us of where we came from and the kind of liberty loving people we once were…and hope to be again one day.

Liberty forever, freedom for all!


Filed under: Uncategorized · Tags: , , , ,

opinions powered by
  • Bunkerville March 23, 2012 at 8:15 AM

    Thanks for a great post. As a direct descendant of Patrick- my mother was a Henry- I can only hope I have a fraction of his DNA floating around inside my head and heart.
    Bunkerville recently posted..Obama and his Marxist Cousin Odinga – Is that why we are in Afirca?My Profile

  • Silverfiddle March 23, 2012 at 8:23 AM

    Now if we could just inject that spirit in to a majority of our fellow citizens. 100 years of union-dominated progressive public schools has snuffed the spirit of 1776 and replaced it with fearful, huddled collectivism.
    Silverfiddle recently posted..(R) “Romney” or “Ryan?”My Profile

  • Jim at Conservatives on Fire March 23, 2012 at 12:34 PM

    It is interest that even in the time of Patrick Henry when the danger was so clear and present in the form of the British navy and army that many people could not or would not see the danger. It makes it easier, although no less frustrating, to understand how so many Americans today do not or will not see the clear and present danger because it is hidden behind the cloak of the nanny state.
    Jim at Conservatives on Fire recently posted..How the Liberals Think _ Two StoriesMy Profile

    • John Carey March 23, 2012 at 11:11 PM

      Many people are simply scared Jim. They don’t want trouble even though our founders if alive today would be leading the charge to reestablish the constitution as the law of the land. People don’t get it because they have never really experienced real liberty.
      John Carey recently posted..Patrick Henry: Give me liberty, or give me death!My Profile

  • Infidel de Manahatta March 23, 2012 at 1:47 PM

    Patrick Henry’s speech was obviously racist and inspired by the climate of hate. Or so a liberal would say.

    Unfortunately Patrick Henry is not alive today to rally us. Too many people are willing to give away their freedom in return for “free stuff” which in reality we all have to pay for.

    The reason representative government will always fail and lead to tyranny is that politicians will always buy votes by promising “free stuff” and the voters will always go along with them.
    Infidel de Manahatta recently posted..Klingon Socialist Wages Lonely Battle for RespectMy Profile

    • John Carey March 23, 2012 at 11:15 PM

      Yep. It easier that way. This is the climate many of the founders to include Patrick Henry were very much afraid of. They understood full well the dangers of democracy and politicians using free stuff to enslave the citizens.
      John Carey recently posted..Patrick Henry: Give me liberty, or give me death!My Profile

  • proof March 23, 2012 at 6:57 PM

    “give me liberty, or give me death!” Whoa, whoa, whoa, Dude! That’s pretty extreme! How about “give me liberty, or give me free contraception”?
    proof recently posted..Friday Night BabeMy Profile

  • Steve Dennis March 24, 2012 at 7:05 AM

    Perhaps the greatest speech ever given! And how far we have slipped since that day, the founders would be shocked at what we have allowed to happen.

  • […] Patrick Henry: Give me liberty, or give me death! […]

  • […] WyBlog: Did Jon Corzine lie to Congress? Why yes, yes he did theCL: Meet Your Elites- Dick Scaife TBA: Tour de Cure- Help me Reach my Goal! The Eye: If you could wipe one person off the face of the Earth, who would it be? SJ: Give me liberty, or give me death! […]

  • […] anniversary Barack Obama chose to all but ignore–which, as John at Sentry Journal pointed out here, was ironic for having been signed into law on the very day that Patrick Henry gave his infamous […]