Articles Comments

SENTRY JOURNAL » Uncategorized » When conservatives don’t embrace liberty

When conservatives don’t embrace liberty

Have you ever met someone who claimed to be conservative to the bone and then turned around and threw their support behind bigger government?  If the answer is yes well you’re not alone.  Let me give you an example of the mindset I finding with many of my “conservative” neighbors.  There are two measures on the North Dakota ballot next Tuesday.  One measure eliminates property taxes while the other strengthens and preserves religious freedom for the individual.  The goal conservatives should be striving to achieve is less government, less regulation, lower taxes, and empowering the individual at all levels.  What I’m finding is that many so-called conservatives are not really embracing these core principles.  Instead they’re throwing their support behind bigger government involvement in their lives.  Let’s start with measure two and eliminating the property tax.

I’ve always said that the easiest way for the government to control and regulate the individual is through taxes.  Confiscating a portion of an individual’s income is a confiscation of their property.  Forcing an individual to pay a tax on their property or face having their property seized by the government is another way the government controls and regulates the lives of each of us.  The conservative position on this issue should be to eliminate or limit the government’s ability to impose its will on the people through taxation.  This is one of the reasons why most conservatives support lower taxes.  Lower taxes equates to greater individual liberty.  And yet many of my conservative neighbors are taking the position of defeating measure two.  They fear the unknown and have bought into the liberal lie that by supporting the elimination of property taxes means they will somehow lose local control of their communities; that they will have to beg the state capital to fund essential services like schools, fire and police departments.  The left and special interest groups have successfully convinced conservatives that government control of their lives is essential.  They want conservatives to ignore the facts the North Dakota is operating with a $5 billion dollar surplus, that the state will be mandated to fund all these essential services if measure two passes and that North Dakota is ranked 10th in terms of the highest property taxes in the nation.

Yes conservatives are ignoring all these facts and opting to allow the continued control and regulation of their lives through property taxes.  They have decided to abandon their conservative principles and embrace bigger government, more regulation, higher taxes and less individual empowerment.  These same conservatives who are walking away from liberty in regards to measure two are standing up and supporting measure three because they believe government has no right to impose its will on them if it goes against their religious beliefs.  I agree.  So let me see if I have this right; they’re ok with government imposing its will on them through the taxation of their property but are against government imposing its will on them if it goes against their religious beliefs.  Does this make any sense at all?  Whether it makes sense or not this is the reality many conservatives are living with in their communities; so-called conservatives who are not acting very conservative.  And based on what I have observed the reason for this support is out of fear of the unknown.  As exciting of a journey liberty can take you on it can also be very scary for many.  A large number of people are comfortable with the devil they know rather than the devil they don’t know even if the devil they know is robbing them blind.  I’m a conservative and I embrace and support the above conservative principles.

As a true conservative I don’t have the option to pick and choose the liberties I want to defend.  I fall on the side of individual liberty and freedom all the time.  Eliminating property taxes empowers the individual and embraces liberty no matter what the perceived consequences.  Preserving religious freedom at the local level embraces liberty and minimizes the government’s ability to impose its will on the people if it goes against their religious beliefs.  This isn’t rocket science.  My friend Jon always tells me that each law created should be measured against the liberty lost or gained by its passage.  Haven’t we lost enough liberty?  It’s time to start taking it back.  North Dakotans have a rare opportunity to grab an arm full of liberty next Tuesday.  Let’s hope they take advantage of it.

Liberty forever, freedom for all!


Filed under: Uncategorized · Tags: , , , , , , ,

opinions powered by
  • Steve Dennis June 8, 2012 at 5:07 AM

    Good luck with these votes John. I think you are right about why these conservatives do not support eliminating the tax; they are afraid of the unknown and this is partly because the liberals have been allowed to control the message for so long.
    At this point these conservatives have become accustomed to paying this tax and the regulations and the loss of liberty that comes with it, so they are more focused on preserving the liberties they currently have instead of fighting for what has been taken from them. We can do both, but it won’t be easy.
    Steve Dennis recently posted..Gunrunner: Eric Holder claims that emails about Fast and Furious weren’t actually about Fast and FuriousMy Profile

    • John Carey June 8, 2012 at 6:17 AM

      It’s very difficult to see conservatives so afraid to do the conservative thing and restore liberty. I guess we have become so accustomed to getting screwed for so long many are worried about losing more liberties. I say we must get over our fear of the unknown and take hold of liberty again when the opportunity presents itself.
      John Carey recently posted..When conservatives don’t embrace libertyMy Profile

  • Silverfiddle June 8, 2012 at 7:50 AM

    Big Mommy and Big Daddy Government have swaddled us for so long that it is scary out there on your own, and that is what progressives were aiming for…
    Silverfiddle recently posted..TimeMy Profile

  • Jim at Conservatives on Fire June 8, 2012 at 11:38 AM

    Maybe the proponents of the initiative should have suggested alternative ways that counties could make up the revenue loss. That way the voters wouldn’t have anything to fear. Property tax is a terrible way to be taxed. You can pay off your mortgage and still you don’t truely own the property.
    Jim at Conservatives on Fire recently posted..Regulatory CaptureMy Profile

    • John Carey June 8, 2012 at 11:59 PM

      You’re probably right Jim. They should have approached this from a different angle. They did not do a great job explaining how the elimination of property taxes benefits the average citizen. It’s confiscated money being returned to the individual. How is that not a good thing?
      John Carey recently posted..When conservatives don’t embrace libertyMy Profile

  • LibertyAtStake June 8, 2012 at 12:31 PM

    This chord was struck with me yesterday as I read the latest print edition of National Review. One of their 2 paragraph opinion blurbs defended the American Community Survey on these grounds … big government being the current reality it should have detailed census data for policy makers. I wanted to scream all the way from DC to New York – “NO! YOU’RE CONCEDING THE BIG GOVERNMENT PREMISE! DEFEATISTS!”

  • Teresa Rice June 8, 2012 at 8:43 PM

    I totally agree with you. One thing I would suggest not because I disagree with you because I don’t but it may help to alleviate fears from the unknown, is that maybe a gradual removal would have been in order so as not to shock the folks in North Dakota? It is my thinking if citizens in North Dakota had the option to vote for a 35% decrease in property taxes and saw positive results then they would be asking for more of a decrease in their property taxes.
    Teresa Rice recently posted..Serenity Prayer: For Every Day & Especially Tough TimesMy Profile

    • John Carey June 9, 2012 at 12:08 AM

      It’s interesting you bring this up because this is exactly what I told many supporters of this bill. Going cold turkey scares the heck out of so many they would rather stay addicted and enslaved to the government then break free.
      John Carey recently posted..When conservatives don’t embrace libertyMy Profile

  • […] SENTRY JOURNAL | When conservatives don’t embrace liberty […]

  • […] and Cyber Technology – Moral, Legal and Privacy Issues SJ: When conservatives don’t embrace liberty BdKS: Andrew ‘Dice’ Clay, Lisa Lampanelli and Barack Obama Walk Into A Bar… […]

  • […] Sentry Journal discusses when Conservatives don’t embrace liberty […]

  • […] When conservatives don’t embrace liberty […]

  • stlgretchen June 10, 2012 at 4:27 PM

    This is something I find surprising as well on the education reforms trotted out by Obama/Arne Duncan and embraced by Jeb Bush and Chris Christie. When so called conservatives support “school choice”, they really are only supporting government mandated standards, assessments and curriculum. It’s not really choice and it is alarming the “darlings” of the conservative movement are celebrated for this position:
    stlgretchen recently posted..Bill Gates, Fairy Tales, Technology, High Stakes Testing and the Sunday Education Weekly Reader 06.10.12My Profile