Articles Comments

SENTRY JOURNAL » Uncategorized » States out of scale: It’s time to break up the 10 State Oligopoly

States out of scale: It’s time to break up the 10 State Oligopoly

Paradigm_shift_sign_465x315_Alt_2Last week I wrote an article about an America that is currently out of scale.  How the Apportionment Act of 1929 which caps the House of Representative at 435 members is diluting our representative republic.  The ratio of Representatives and those who they represent is way out of scale creating an unmanageable environment on the national level.  When your voice is 1 out of 710,000 do you really feel represented?  What if your opinion or ideology is in the minority in your state or district?  Is the answer moving to another district or state where your opinion or ideology is in the majority?  This is where the saying vote with your feet comes from.  If you don’t like how things are working out in your state or how you are being taxed or the policies being implemented you have the option to move.  But does this solve the problem or just shift it around?

In order to answer this question we need to understand how our system was originally designed. The basic premise of a representative style republic is that the voice of the people is represented by elected officials in the government.  Our Founding Fathers set up our system of government so that both that states (Senate) and the people’s (House) interests were represented on a national scale.  With the ratification of the 17th amendment in 1913, Senators were no longer elected by the state legislators.  Instead they were to be elected through popular vote further eroding the states’ power in the federal government.  Combine that with Apportionment Act of 1929 we can now see how successful progressives were in the early 20th century in fundamentally transforming America.  These two acts not only diminished the power of our representative government, but was also the beginning of consolidating power at the federal level.  Both states’ rights and individual liberty suffered.  States began to grow out of scale and state and individual representation began to wane.   So how do we reverse this trend?  How do we get things back to a scale that empowers the individual and promotes individual liberty in a post constitutional republic?

One suggestion I made last week actually expands the size of the federal government by repealing the Apportionment Act of 1929 increasing the number of members in the House.  A good starting point would be doubling the number of representatives.  My second suggestion and the main topic of this article is it’s time to take a hard look at the states and their scale.    Let’s examine the 10 most populated states in America per the 2010 census.   California, Texas, New York, Florida, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Georgia, and North Carolina have a combined population 167 million; 54 percent of the population of the entire nation.  They have a combined number of representatives of 236 members in the House; 54 percent of the total number of members in the House.  This equates to a ratio of 1 representative per every 706,000 people.  Once again this is out of scale.  Worse yet are these 10 states control a combined total of 256 Electoral College votes; a whopping 94 percent of the 270 votes needed to win the Presidency.  And changing from the Electoral College system to a national popular vote only adds to the problem.  Presidential candidates will only campaign in the states that are more populated leaving smaller less populated states out in the cold.  The business term for this is Oligopoly; A situation in which a particular market is controlled by a small group of firms.  In this case the market is political and these 10 states control it.  The problems are more revealing when you start to drill down into the numbers.

Let’s look at California.  California controls 55 Electoral College votes and their total population of 37 million is 11 percent of the national population.  They have 53 seats in the House of Representatives and out of those 53 seats 38 are held by Democrats and 15 are held by Republicans.  Additionally both Senators from California are Democrat.  So if you’re a conservative in California you are represented by 15 Republicans in the House and no State Senator in the Senate.  Liberals can make the same argument about Texas.  Texas has a population of 25 million.  Both Senators are Republicans.  And out of 36 seats in the House only 12 are held by Democrats.  If you’re a liberal living in Texas you’re feeling pretty unrepresented.  But the main problem as I see it is a few states controlling everything in regards to the political process in America.  This Oligopoly must be broken up because these 10 states wield far too much influence over the entire political process in America.

America is out of scale and the people are suffering for it.  The states are America and we need to take a hard look at the state of the states.  If we want to get this thing in its proper scale we need to start looking at downsizing these heavily populated states.  We need to consider breaking the larger states up into smaller states.  This will do two things.  First people will be better represented because by breaking up the states the representative ratio decreases giving the people more of a voice and bringing the government closer to them.  The second thing it does is breaks up this Oligopoly of 10 states and disperses the power amongst the remaining 40 states.  This eliminates centralize control and shifts the political power back to the states.  This will force politicians to deal with all the states on a more level playing field.  And that’s a good thing for America, states’ rights, and individual liberty.

Not all will agree with this and that’s ok.  It’s only an idea and I’m sure there are many ideas ready to be promoted and discussed.  So let me know what you think and don’t be afraid of hurting my feelings by disagreeing.  The point of this is to get us thinking outside of the box to save what’s left of America.

Liberty forever, freedom for all!

Share

Filed under: Uncategorized · Tags: , , , , ,

opinions powered by SendLove.to
Comments
  • LibertyAtStake February 6, 2013 at 1:28 PM

    Excellent food for thought. It also brought back to mind something I witnessed on C-Span way back in 1991. The California Assembly was debating a proposal to split the state north and south. The guy from San Diego stood up and said “the only thing I don’t like about this plan is we get Los Angeles.”
    LibertyAtStake recently posted..BullSkeetMy Profile

    • John Carey February 7, 2013 at 6:17 AM

      I know for California this has actually been talked about because the people in Northern California have very different interests and concerns than people in Southern California. When I lived in South Dakota it was always divided by the river that cut through the state. You had east river and west river concerns. It’s definitely some food for thought and something I think worth discussing.
      John Carey recently posted..States out of scale: It’s time to break up the 10 State Oligopoly My Profile

  • Steve Dennis February 6, 2013 at 5:14 PM

    That may seem like a radical idea John, but it is definitively food for thought because these states to seem to have an extraordinary amount of influence in the national elections. Why is it that people like me in New Hampshire are so influenced by the voters of so few states and how is that fair?
    I am all for repealing the 17th amendment as I feel that has done more to turn America from a republic into a democracy, and that is something the founders feared almost as much as a monarchy.
    Steve Dennis recently posted..New Hampshire Democrat Annie Kuster’s tax problemMy Profile

    • John Carey February 7, 2013 at 6:37 AM

      Yes repealing the 17th amendment is a step in the right direction. When Senators are beholden to the public instead of the states they are about special interest groups and the interests of the states take a second chair. As for these states breaking up I do think it’s a conversation worth having considering how much influence the do peddle in the political process in America. I’m just throwing it out there with the numbers to back it. It’s up to us to decide if there’s any merit to it.
      John Carey recently posted..States out of scale: It’s time to break up the 10 State Oligopoly My Profile

  • Jim at Asylum Watch February 7, 2013 at 5:42 AM

    Can’t we just expell them from the Union? :-)
    Jim at Asylum Watch recently posted..The Politics of Oil and Gas __ No. 2, “Will King Oil Be Dethroned By King Gas?”My Profile

    • John Carey February 7, 2013 at 6:41 AM

      Not sure that would be a step in the right direction. However I do believe downsizing these states is something we need to look at. I know it’s radical, but I wanted this to be an exercise of thinking outside of the box because in the near future critical thinking skills will be required again to save America.
      John Carey recently posted..States out of scale: It’s time to break up the 10 State Oligopoly My Profile